Apparatus for removing a blocking phenomenon in a block based on prioritized factors

ABSTRACT

In one embodiment, the apparatus includes a decoder configured to obtain a coded block pattern of first and second blocks. The coded block pattern is one of a plurality of coded block patterns, the plurality of coded block patterns include an intra-coded block, and the second block is adjacent to the first block. The decoder is configured to obtain a motion vector difference between a motion vector for the first block and a motion vector for the second block, and determine a non-zero filter strength value based on the obtained coded block pattern of the first and second block as first priority and the obtained motion vector difference as second priority. The blocking phenomenon is removed by the decoder according to the filter strength value.

DOMESTIC PRIORITY INFORMATION

This is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/097,394 filed Apr. 5, 2005, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/170,999 filed Jun. 14, 2002, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,272,186; the contents of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

FOREIGN PRIORITY INFORMATION

The present invention claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 on Korean Application No. 2001-33953 filed Jun. 15, 2001; the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a moving picture compression technique, and more particularly, to a loop filtering method in a video coder.

2. Description of the Background Art

Generally, it has been proved that the “H.26L” system developed as a next generation moving picture compression technique is superior to the “H.263” and “MPEG4” systems in performance.

The “H.26L” system as the next generation moving picture compression system differs from the conventional H.263 and MPEG4 in using 4×4 block based transformation & encoding, carrying out motion estimation & compensation of a transformation block size, and using a single variable length coder (VLC).

Superior to the conventional motion picture standards in aspect of performance, the H.26L system has excessive calculation of encoder as well as uses 4×4 block based transformation so that a blocking dominates than the conventional standards.

In order to remove the blocking, filters include a loop filtering system inside the encoder and decoder, a post filter processed in a next stage of the decoder, and a system adding the loop filtering system to the post filter.

When the blocking is removed by the loop filtering system in general, a difference between an input video and a motion video is affected so that an encoding rate increases in a specific case. Yet, as the loop filtering system is installed inside a video coder, complexity of the encoder increases.

As mentioned in the above explanation, the H.26L system according to the related art requires excessive quantity of calculation despite the superiority in performance to the moving picture standards as well as having the blocking more dominant than that of the moving picture standards due to the 4×4 block based transformation system.

Moreover, if the blocking is removed by the loop filtering system according to the related art, the difference between the input video and the motion video is affected so as to increase the encoding rate in a specific case. Yet, the loop filtering system built inside the video coder increases the complexity of the encoder.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an apparatus for removing a blocking phenomenon using properties of two blocks.

In one embodiment, the apparatus includes a decoder configured to obtain a coded block pattern of first and second blocks. The coded block pattern is one of a plurality of coded block patterns, the plurality of coded block patterns include an intra-coded block, and the second block is adjacent to the first block. The decoder is configured to obtain a motion vector difference between a motion vector for the first block and a motion vector for the second block, and determine a non-zero filter strength value based on the obtained coded block pattern of the first and second block as first priority and the obtained motion vector difference as second priority. The blocking phenomenon is removed by the decoder according to the filter strength value.

It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description of the present invention are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiment(s) of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principle of the invention. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 illustrates a flowchart of a loop filtering process according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate block diagrams indicating block locations in horizontal and vertical directions according to an embodiment of the present invention, respectively;

FIG. 3 illustrates a diagram of pixel locations of adjacent blocks according to an embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 4 illustrates a table of LQP values for determining DQP(QP) values according to an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

Reference will now be made in detail to the example embodiments of the present invention, which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.

Hereinafter, a loop filtering method in a video coder according to an example embodiment of the present invention carries out a real-time processing of removing a blocking and a ringing phenomenon in accordance with a pixel location, a coded block pattern, a quantization step size, and a motion vector size in a digital video appliance using the H.26L moving picture compression technique, thereby enabling to improve a video quality of a compression image demanding a low bit rate or high-speed processing.

First, explained in detail is a real-time processing technique of removing “blocking” and “ringing” by predicting an original video for correlation between pixels in accordance with a quantization variable QP, a coded block pattern, and a motion vector size available for a decoder (not shown in the drawing) in a digital video appliance.

When an original video f is transmitted as a compressed form, a video restructured in a decoder can be expressed by the following Formula 1-1. g=f+n, where g, f, and n are a compression video rearranged in a scanning order, an original video, and a column vector of quantization error, respectively.  [Formula 1-1]

A relation between respective pixels can be expressed by the following Formula 1-2 in order to process the Formula 1-1 by pixel unit. g(i,j)=f(i,j)+n(i,j), where i and j indicate a location of a pixel in vertical and horizontal directions.  [Formula 1-2]

An additional function can be defined as the following Formula 1-3 when reliability of original pixels and 1-dimensional smoothing function for each pixel are used together with a regularization. Firstly, a horizontal direction is considered. M{f(i,j)}=M _(p) {f(i,j)}+M _(N) {f(i,j)}, where M_(p) and M_(N) are functions representing reliability smoothing degrees of left and right directions for a pixel f(i,j), respectively.  [Formula 1-3]

And, such functions are defined as the following Formula 1-4, where the M_(P) and M_(N) are the functions considering f(i,j) & f(i,j−1) and f(i,j) & f(i,j+1), respectively. M _(P) {f(i,j)}=α_(P) {f(i,j)−f(i,j−1)}²+(1−α_(P)){g(i,j)−f(i,j)}² M _(N) {f(i,j)}=α_(N) {f(i,j)−f(i,j−1)}²+(1−α_(N)){g(i,j)−f(i,j)}²  [Formula 1-4]

Each of the first terms of right sides in Formula 1-4 indicates irregularity with an adjacent pixel, i.e. a difference from an adjacent pixel, for the pixel f(i,j), and each of the second terms indicates a reliability for the original pixel f(i,j). Moreover, α_(P) and α_(N) mean regularization parameters representing ratios between irregular and reliability terms defined in the functions, respectively. And, α_(P) and α_(N) are parameters adjusting a relative coherence between the two terms in Formula 1-4.

With the above manner, the additional function is defined for each pixel of the moving picture, and the function in a vertical direction is defined by varying the parameter i instead of the parameter j in Formula 1-4.

Thereafter, if a differential is applied to the additional functions in Formula 1-4 defined for each pixel of the moving picture in order to find a restored video from which the blocking and ringing are removed, the following Formulas 1-5 and 1-6 are attained. $\begin{matrix} {\frac{{\partial M}\left\{ {f\left( {i,j} \right)} \right\}}{\partial{f\left( {i,j} \right)}} = {{\frac{{\partial M_{P}}\left\{ {f\left( {i,j} \right)} \right\}}{\partial{f\left( {i,j} \right)}} + \frac{{\partial M_{N}}\left\{ {f\left( {i,j} \right)} \right\}}{\partial{f\left( {i,j} \right)}}} = 0}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\quad 1\text{-}5} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

From Formula 1-5, the following Formula 1-6 is found. $\begin{matrix} {{\frac{{\partial M_{P}}\left\{ {f\left( {i,j} \right)} \right\}}{\partial{f\left( {i,j} \right)}} = {{2{\partial_{P}\left\{ {{f\left( {i,j} \right)} - {f\left( {i,{j - 1}} \right)}} \right\}}} - {2\left( {1 - \alpha_{P}} \right)\left\{ {{g\left( {i,j} \right)} - {f\left( {i,j} \right)}} \right\}}}}{\frac{{\partial M_{N}}\left\{ {f\left( {i,j} \right)} \right\}}{\partial{f\left( {i,j} \right)}} = {{2{\partial_{N}\left\{ {{f\left( {i,j} \right)} - {f\left( {i,{j - 1}} \right)}} \right\}}} - {2\left( {1 - \alpha_{N}} \right)\left\{ {{g\left( {i,j} \right)} - {f\left( {i,j} \right)}} \right\}}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\quad 1\text{-}6} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

From Formulas 1-5 and 1-6, the pixel to be restored in a horizontal direction can be found by the following Formula 1-7. $\begin{matrix} {{f\left( {i,j} \right)} = \frac{\begin{matrix} {{\left( {2 - \alpha_{P} - \alpha_{N}} \right){g\left( {i,j} \right)}} +} \\ {{\alpha_{P}{f\left( {i,{j - 1}} \right)}} + {\alpha_{N}{f\left( {i,{j + 1}} \right)}}} \end{matrix}}{2}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\quad 1\text{-}7} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

As the regularization parameters in Formula 1-7 are between “0” and “1”, Formula 1-7 can be defined by the following Formula 1-8. $\begin{matrix} {{f\left( {i,j} \right)} = \frac{\begin{matrix} {{\left( {2 - \alpha_{\quad P} - \alpha_{\quad N}} \right){g\left( {i,j} \right)}} +} \\ {{\alpha_{\quad P}{g\left( {i,{j - 1}} \right)}} + {\alpha_{\quad N}{g\left( {i,{j + 1}} \right)}}} \end{matrix}}{2}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\quad 1\text{-}8} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

Looking into Formula 1-8, a blocking-removed video of the compression video is determined by the two, left and right pixel values and the regularization parameters by taking the i_(th) and j_(th) videos as references.

As the two, left and right pixel values can be used for encoding and decoding, two regularization parameter values are set up for attaining the restored video. For this, “set theoretic” is applied to the restoration by pixel unit so as to represent regularization coefficients by the following Formula 1-9, where “set theoretic” is a theory for controlling the parameters α_(P) and α_(N) in Formula 1-4. $\begin{matrix} {{\frac{\alpha_{P}}{1 - \alpha_{P}} = {\frac{\left\{ {{f\left( {i,j} \right)} - {g\left( {i,j} \right)}} \right\}^{2}}{\left\{ {{f\left( {i,j} \right)} - {f\left( {i,{j - 1}} \right)}} \right\}^{2}} \approx \frac{K_{P}{QP}^{2}}{\left\{ {{g\left( {i,j} \right)} - {g\left( {i,{j - 1}} \right)}} \right\}^{2}}}},{\frac{\alpha_{N}}{1 - \alpha_{N}} = {\frac{\left\{ {{f\left( {i,j} \right)} - {g\left( {i,j} \right)}} \right\}^{2}}{\left\{ {{f\left( {i,j} \right)} - {f\left( {i,{j + 1}} \right)}} \right\}^{2}} \approx \frac{K_{N}{QP}^{2}}{\left\{ {{g\left( {i,j} \right)} - {g\left( {i,{j + 1}} \right)}} \right\}^{2}}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\quad 1\text{-}9} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

K_(P) and K_(N) in Formula 1-9 are determined statistically as adaptive parameters depending on a location of a pixel since the irregularities between pixels at a block boundary and an inner block side are different from each other. And, “QP” is a quantization parameter of a macro block to which the pixel f(i,j) belongs.

Even though the restored video from which blocking is removed using Formulas 1-8 and 1-9, the value of the regularization parameter requires a floating-point operation so as to become a problem in aspect of calculation quantity of the filter to remove the “blocking”.

Therefore, Formulas 1-8 and 1-9 are transformed into the following Formulas 1-10 and 1-11 for integer operation. $\begin{matrix} {{f\left( {i,j} \right)} = {{\left( {2^{9} - {\alpha_{P} \times 2^{8}} - {\alpha_{N} \times 2^{8}}} \right){g\left( {i,j} \right)}} + {\alpha_{P} \times 2^{8} \times {g\left( {i,{j - 1}} \right)}} + {\alpha_{N} \times 2^{8} \times {g\left( {i,{j + 1}} \right)}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\quad 1\text{-}10} \right\rbrack \\ {{\beta_{P} = {{\alpha_{P} \times 2^{8}} = \frac{2^{8} \times K_{P}{QP}^{2}}{{K_{P}{QP}^{2}} + \left\{ {{g\left( {i,j} \right)} - {g\left( {i,{j - 1}} \right\}}^{2}} \right.}}},{\beta_{N} = {{\alpha_{N} \times 2^{8}} = \frac{2^{8} \times K_{N}{QP}^{2}}{{K_{N}{QP}^{2}} + \left\{ {{g\left( {i,j} \right)} - {g\left( {i,{j - 1}} \right\}}^{2}} \right.}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\quad 1\text{-}11} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

In this case, β_(P) and β_(N), as defined in Formula 1-11, are variables attained by multiplying α_(P) and α_(N) by 2⁸, respectively. Namely, β_(P) and β_(N) are parameters for making α_(P) and α_(N) into integers.

In an algorithm according to the present invention, the regularization parameters as integer forms using Formula 1-11 are generated, and then stored as a look-up table form to be used.

Hence, Formula 1-10 for blocking filtering can be found by knowing the pixel f(i,j) and locations and quantization parameter values of two pixels adjacent to the pixel f(i,j).

Meanwhile, in the loop filtering process of the present invention, a video of which blocking in a direction of a horizontal axis is removed by loop-filtering a block of a moving picture is attained, and then the video is loop-filtered in a direction of a vertical axis so as to provide the video of which blocking in a direction of a vertical axis is removed.

FIG. 1 illustrates a flowchart of a loop filtering process according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Referring to FIG. 1, a loop filtering method according to an embodiment of the present invention includes the steps of determining a strength of a block to be processed in accordance with a coded pattern and a quantization step size of each 4×4 block when a block of a moving picture is loop-filtered in directions of its horizontal and vertical axes (S11), carrying out a loop filtering in accordance with the determined strength of the corresponding block (S12), and carrying out an additional loop filtering at a boundary region of a macro block since a relatively big blocking exists at the boundary region of the macro block (S13). This is explained in detail by referring to FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, and FIG. 3.

FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate block diagrams indicating block locations in horizontal and vertical directions according to an embodiment of the present invention, respectively, and FIG. 3 illustrates a diagram of pixel locations of adjacent blocks according to an embodiment of the present invention, in which block locations in directions of horizontal and vertical axes are shown.

First of all, the step of determining the block strength St and a filtering state is explained as follows.

The step of determining the block strength St and a filtering state is a process for determining the H.26L system as standards, for which TML (test model long-term number 5) is in progress. In this case, the TML compresses a video by taking a 4×4 block as a reference.

The TML (test model long-term) moving picture compression system uses a technique of removing spatial and temporal redundancy information from an encoder so as to transmit spatially & temporally compressed information and additional information required for decoding. Of course, in order to remove the redundancy information on a temporal domain, MPEG (moving picture expert group) and H.263 motion compensation system according to the related art are used. The technique of removing the blocking using a basic mechanism of such a TML system is generally treated by 4×4 block unit.

In this case, H.263 and H.26L are moving picture compression standards proposed by ITU-T (international telecommunications union-telecommunication).

The system for removing the blocking according to an embodiment of the present invention may follow the system of the related art. Yet, the filtering state is determined by the following pre-treatment steps 1 to 3 since the degree of the blocking differs in accordance with a coded block pattern, a quantization step size, and a motion vector size.

[Step 1]

Strength St of each 4×4 block is initialized by ‘0’ (St=0).

[Step 2]

If each of the 4×4 blocks is an intra-coded block or has a non-zero transform coefficient, St=max(St,2).

[Step 3]

If a motion vector difference between respective motion vectors for the two blocks block1 and block2 in FIG. 2(a) and FIG. 2(b) is equal to or greater than ‘1’, St=Max(St,1).

In this case, max(a,b) means a maximum value of ‘a’ and ‘b’. Namely, max(a,b) is a function for selecting a greater value from ‘a’ and ‘b’.

Moreover, after the strength St of each of the blocks has been determined, the loop filtering is carried out in accordance with the quantization size of each of the blocks.

For carrying out the loop filtering, the quantization sizes of the two blocks block1 and block2 are as follows.

First case is that the quantization value of the block block1 is smaller than ‘21’ and the strengths of the two blocks block1 and block2 are not ‘0’. And, second case is that the quantization value of the block block1 is greater than ‘20’ and the strength St of one of the two blocks block1 and block2 is not ‘0’.

In this case, the filtering state is determined differently in accordance with the quantization size because an adaptive treatment is performed due to the dominating generation of blocking in case of a great quantization size.

Therefore, when the conditions for the pre-treatment steps 1 to 3 are met, the loop filtering process is carried out by the following manner.

First, pixel locations of two blocks block1 and block2 are shown in FIG. 3. If the above-defined filtering state of each of the blocks is satisfied, values of pixels c, d, e, and f are found by the following Formula 2-1 (for calculating filter coefficient values to be used in Formula 2-5). r1=reg{St ₁ ,QP,abs(b−c)}, r2=reg{St ₁ ,QP,abs(c−d)}, r3=reg{max(St ₁+1,St ₂+1),QP,abs(d−e)}, r4=reg{St ₂ ,QP,abs(e−f)}, r5=reg{St ₂ ,QP,abs(f−g)}  [Formula 2-1]

From Formula 2-1, reg(.) is defined by the following Formula 2-2. $\begin{matrix} {{{{reg}\left( {{St},{QP},{Diff}} \right)} = \frac{256 \times {M({St})} \times {{DQP}({QP})}}{{{Diff} \times {Diff}} + {{M({St})} \times {{DQP}({QP})}}}},} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\quad 2\text{-}2} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$ where Diff is a random value and ‘abs’ indicates a function of absolute value.

And, M(St) is defined by the following Formula 2-3. M(St=0)=1/6, M(St=1)=4/16, M(St=2)=8/16, M(St=3)=1  {Formula 2-3}

And, DQP(QP) is explained by referring to FIG. 4 as follows.

FIG. 4 illustrates a table of LQP values for determining DQP(QP) values according to an embodiment of the present invention. Namely, DQP(QP) is defined by the following Formula 2-4, and can be found by substituting the LQP values shown in the table of FIG. 4. LQP is a quantization table defined in H.26L, and DQP defines a quantization error range in accordance with the quantization table defined in H.26L as defined by Formula 2-4. Namely, the LQP values are “620”, “553”, “429”, . . . , “24”, and “22” if the quantization variables QP are “0”, “1”, “2”, . . . , “30”, and “31”, respectively. Namely, as the quantization variable (0, 1, 2, . . . , 30, 31) increases sequentially, the LQP value decreases with a predetermined value (620, 553, 492, . . . , 24, and 22). $\begin{matrix} {{{DQP}({QP})} = \frac{676}{{LQP}({QP})}} & \left\lbrack {{Formula}\quad 2\text{-}4} \right\rbrack \end{matrix}$

Formula 1-11 is equivalent to Formula 2-2, and QP², K_(P)(or K_(N)), and {g(i,j)−g(i,j−1)} in Formula 1-11 are parameters equivalent to DQP(QP), M(St), and Diff in Formula 2-2, respectively.

Hence, the filtered values of the pixels c, d, e, and f are calculated by the following Formula 2-5 using the defined parameters. c _(mod={()512−r1−r2)×c+r1×b+r2×d+256}>>9 d _(mod={()512−r2−r3)×d+r2×c+r3×e+256}>>9 e _(mod={()512−r3−r4)×c+r3×e+r4×f+256}>>9 f _(mod={()512−r4−r5)×f+r4×e+r5×g+256}>>9, where “>>” means a bit shift, and C_(mod), d_(mod), e_(mod), and f_(mod) mean values of filtering c˜f having the blocking shown in FIG. 3.  [Formula 2-5]

Meanwhile, the result from the above-explained processing brings about an effect of removing the blocking and ringing with satisfaction. Yet, micro blocking still exists in the boundary region of the macro block constituted by 16×16 block unit. In order to settle the micro blocking, an additional filtering, as shown in Formula 2-6, is carried out on the pixel lying at the boundary region of the macro block. d _(mod=() c _(mod)+13×d _(mod)+2×e _(mod)+8)>>4 e _(mod=()2×d _(mod)+13×e _(mod) +f _(mod)+8)>>4, if QP>16 and d and e are macro block boundary pixels.

Accordingly, the present invention carries out a real-time processing of removing a blocking and a ringing phenomenon in accordance with a pixel location, a coded block pattern, a quantization step size, and a motion vector size in a digital video appliance using the H.26L moving picture compression technique, thereby enabling to improve a video quality of a compression image demanding a low bit rate or high-speed processing.

The foregoing embodiments are merely exemplary and are not to be construed as limiting the present invention. The present teachings can be readily applied to other types of apparatuses. The description of the present invention is intended to be illustrative, and not to limit the scope of the claims. Many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. 

1. An apparatus for removing a blocking phenomenon using properties of two blocks, comprising: a decoder, the decoder configured to obtain a coded block pattern of first and second blocks, the coded block pattern being one of a plurality of coded block patterns, the plurality of coded block patterns including an intra-coded block, and the second block being adjacent to the first block, the decoder configured to obtain a motion vector difference between a motion vector for the first block and a motion vector for the second block, the decoder configured to determine a non-zero filter strength value based on the obtained coded block pattern of the first and second block as first priority and the obtained motion vector difference as second priority, and remove the blocking phenomenon according to the filter strength value. 